Wenxue City Finance in the Media
Wenxue City Finance in the Media, In the media, stories about Wenxue City have been largely reported by Western and Beijing-friendly Western media, and by Chinese state media. This is a significant problem because stories about Wenxue City often contain propaganda from the Chinese government, and the media’s bias toward China reflects this. Moreover, only 16.4% of articles on Wenxue City are written by Western journalists; most of the stories focusing on the city are written by Chinese state media.
Table of Contents
Articles mentioning the CCP or Xi Jinping
A review of Wenxue City’s finance articles shows that most do not have a pro-CCP bias. Of those articles, 8% are pro-CCP. Among those that are pro-CCP are a man-on-the-street interview with Global Times editor Hu Xijin and an analysis of whether the protesters in Hong Kong are “anti-China.” However, these articles are newsworthy even to those who have no sympathy for the Chinese leadership.
There are many reasons why Wenxue City finance articles mention the CCP or Xi Jinping. Many of these articles are politically-motivated, but that’s not surprising given the tight censorship in China today. In addition to the fact that Xi Jinping is one of the most popular subjects on Chinese media, articles about him tend to be accompanied by other taboo topics such as the Tiananmen Massacre. One headline even reads, “The ‘last secret’ of the Tiananmen Incident.”
Articles originating from publicly funded Western media
The state-media relationship has undergone major changes in the last two years, with journalists from both commercial and state-funded news organizations highlighting the importance of transnational news in diplomacy and state-building. Commercial news journalists were acutely aware of the material capital that their state-funded counterparts have at their disposal, and they often mentioned colleagues who moved to the AJE in search of greater resources. A large proportion of commercial journalists expressed their desire to join the BBCWS in response to its generous state funding.
Journalists from state-funded news organizations, however, faced more obstacles in reporting on politics and international affairs. In response to these obstacles, they collectively resisted the diplomatic strategies of funding governments. In particular, they were concerned that damaging their cultural capital would prevent them from securing positions at other transnational news outlets. Therefore, their efforts were in vain. However, journalists must continue to fight the pressures imposed by their state-funded governments and insist on the right to publish what they see.
Top 59 outlets responsible for 63.3% of all articles shared
According to our analysis, the articles originating from Chinese state media and Beijing-friendly international media make up 16.4% of the content shared on Wenxue City. By contrast, a majority of articles originate from publicly-funded Western media, including four out of the top five outlets. This means that the Chinese state media and Beijing-friendly media are less influential than they once were.
The articles’ content isn’t all positive. More than a third take a neutral stance. These may be first-person descriptions of damage to Hong Kong streets after tear gas was used. Other examples might be debates on the Tiananmen massacre, or stories that mention Hong Kong only incidentally. Regardless of the author, these articles are not a clear reflection of the political climate in the city.
We have come to the end of our content about the Wenxue City Finance in the Media. In order to access more relevant content, please provide a search based on Google Dec